Peran Experiential Learning dalam Optimalisasi Keterampilan Praktik Pedagogis Guru SMP untuk Program Kokurikuler STEM Kontekstual

Main Article Content

Asep Agus Sulaeman

Abstract





Perencanaan program dan implementasi pembelajaran kokurikuler STEM yang difasilitasi oleh guru dapat mendukung pencapaian kompetensi bernalar siswa sebagai bekal dalam kehidupan pada abad ke-21. Pada kenyataannya, pembelajaran ini belum optimal dilaksanakan disekolah karena berbagai tantangan dalam pengembangan program yang belum sepenuhnya teratasi oleh guru. Oleh karena itu, kajian ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan kesiapan kognitif yang mendukung keterampilan praktik pedagogis guru dalam pembelajaran kokurikuler STEM kontekstual melalui pelatihan dengan strategi experiential learning. Pelatihan dilaksanakan selama 42 jam pelajaran tatap muka, dengan melibatkan 21 guru SMP dari 17 kabupaten/kota di Jawa Barat. Penelitian ini menggunakan mixed method dengan desain Explanatory Sequential. Pengumpulan data kuantitatif meliputi: 1) nilai pretes dan postes untuk mengukur kesiapan kognitif; 2) penilaian dokumen perencanaan untuk mengukur keterampilan praktis pedagogis; dan 3) kuesioner untuk mengukur respons guru. Adapun data kualitatif diperoleh melalui respons guru terhadap pertanyaan terbuka. Hasil kajian menunjukkan adanya peningkatan kesiapan kognitif yang ditandai dengan perbedaan signifikan antara nilai pretes dan postes, serta didukung oleh persepsi positif guru terhadap peningkatan kesiapan kognitifnya. Keterampilan praktis pedagogis guru secara umum mencapai kategori baik dan sangat baik. Sebagai tindak lanjut, pelatihan di masa mendatang memerlukan penambahan durasi pembelajaran serta pendampingan intensif bagi guru dalam menyusun rencana program STEM beserta instrumen asesmennya.


 


The planning and implementation of teacher-facilitated STEM co-curricular learning can support the achievement of students' reasoning competencies to prepare them for 21st-century life. In reality, this learning process has not run optimally in school due to various challenges in program development that teachers have yet to fully overcome. Therefore, this study aims to improve cognitive readiness supporting teachers' practical pedagogical skills for contextual STEM co-curricular learning through an experiential learning strategy. The training was conducted over 42 face-to-face lesson hours, involving 21 junior high school teachers from 17 districts/cities in West Java. This study employed a mixed-methods approach with an Explanatory Sequential design. Quantitative data collection included: 1) pretest and posttest scores to measure cognitive readiness; 2) planning document assessment rubrics to evaluate practical pedagogical skills; and 3) questionnaires to measure teacher responses. Qualitative data were obtained through teachers' responses to open-ended questions. The results indicated an increase in cognitive readiness, evidenced by a significant difference between pretest and posttest scores, which was corroborated by teachers' positive perceptions of their cognitive improvement. Furthermore, teachers' practical pedagogical skills generally achieved good and excellent categories. As a follow-up, future training requires an extension of learning duration and intensive mentoring for teachers in designing STEM program plans alongside their assessment instruments.





Article Details

How to Cite
Sulaeman, A. A. (2026). Peran Experiential Learning dalam Optimalisasi Keterampilan Praktik Pedagogis Guru SMP untuk Program Kokurikuler STEM Kontekstual . Jurnal Widyaiswara Indonesia , 7(1), 27-43. https://doi.org/10.56259/jwi.v7i1.479
Section
Artikel Riset (Research Paper)

References

Al-Mughairi, S. Y. H., Ahmed, K., & Al-Harrasi, Y. I. (2023). Modeling experiential learning in teacher professional development: A reflection-on-practice perspective. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 22(3), 391–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-023-09337-z
Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan (BSKAP). (2025). Panduan kokurikuler. Pusat Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran-Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.
Diana, N., Turmudi, & Yohannes. (2021). Analysis of teachers’ difficulties in implementing STEM approach in learning: a study literature. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012219
Fitriani, A., & Permanasari, A. (2022). Pelatihan STEM berbasis experiential learning untuk meningkatkan kompetensi pedagogis dan kesiapan kognitif guru. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(2), 215–226. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i2.35120
Giamellaro, M., Siegel, M. A., & Davis, M. C. (2023). Moving from short-term to extended duration professional development: The impact of dose and duration on teacher practice in rural schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60(4), 856–881. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21815
Girvan, C., Conneely, C., & Tangney, B. (2016). Extending Experiential Learning in Teacher Professional Development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 129-139
Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2015). The Adult Learner: The Definitive Classic in Adult Education and Human Resource Development (8th ed.). Routledge.
Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential Learning: Experience as The Source of Learning and Development 2nd Edition. Pearson Education LTD.
König, J., Santagata, R., Scheiner, T., Blömeke, S., & Kaiser, G. (2021). Teacher noticing and pedagogical decision-making: Conceptualizations and empirical research. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 53(5), 1165–1178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01302-3
Lo, C. K. (2021). Design principles for effective teacher professional development in integrated STEM education: A systematic review. Educational Technology & Society, 24(4), 136–152.
Nguyen Cong, N., Thi Thuy, H. P., Thi Kim, O. T., & Nguyen Vi, P. (2025). Interdisciplinary Teaching in STEM Education: A Systematic Synthesis of Teachers’ Competencies at Lower and Upper Secondary Levels. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research . 24(11), 808-82
Nurtanto, M., Fawaid, M., & Sofyan, H. (2022). Keterlibatan aktif guru dalam pengembangan profesionalisme berkelanjutan: Mengintegrasikan pengalaman mengajar dan rekonstruksi pedagogis. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 28(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.17977/um038v28i12022p45-56
OECD. (2024). PISA 2022 results (Volume III): Factsheets – Indonesia. OECD Publishing.
Papagiannopoulou, T., Vaiopoulou, J., & Dimitriou, E. (2024). Teachers’ Attitudes Towards STEM Education: Exploring The Role of Their Readiness. Education Sciences, 14, Article 98.
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Nomor 10 Tahun 2025. Standar Kompetensi Lulusan pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, dan Jenjang Pendidikan Menengah.
Postholm, M. B. (2021). Teachers’ professional development in school: A review study. European Journal of Teacher Education, 44(5), 701–720. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1809650
Prasetyo, A., Handayani, S., & Wijaya, M. (2022). Analisis Kedalaman Pemahaman Konsep Siswa dalam Pembelajaran STEM Berbasis Produk Tanpa Refleksi Terstruktur. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 8 (1), 74–83.
Pratama, R. A., Suwandi, S., & Wardani, N. E. (2022). Mentoring Teman Sejawat (Peer Mentoring) Sebagai Strategi Penguatan Kompetensi Pedagogis dan Kolaborasi Profesional Guru. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 7 (3b), 1620–1627.
Purwianingsih, W., Widodo, A., Riandi., Sriyati, S., Solihat, R. (2025). Pelatihan Desain Pembelajaran STEM-ESD untuk Guru SMA Wujudkan Hidup Berkelanjutan. Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 5 (4) 843-856.
Rahmawati, D., & Fitriani, A. (2021). Penerapan scaffolding dan interaksi sejawat dalam meningkatkan kemampuan pedagogis guru. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 7(2), 145–154.
Rusminati, E., & Juniarso, T. (2023). Efektivitas Pendekatan STEM dalam Mengembangkan Keterampilan Kolaborasi dan Kemampuan Bernalar Siswa Abad 21. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 9 (1), 45–56.
Sa’adah, R. A., Suyanto, S., & Faizah, N. (2025). Challenges in Implementing STEM Education: Overview from Several Countries. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11 (6), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i6.9961
Sellami A, Santhosh M, Bhadra J and Ahmad Z (2024) Teachers’ Perceptions of The Barriers to STEM Teaching In Qatar’s Secondary Schools: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis. Froniers. Education, 9: 1333669. https://doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1333669
Shernoff, D. J., Sinha, S., Bressler, D. M., & Bennett, L. J. (2023). Organizational structures, leadership, and teacher support within and outside of schools: factors promoting and hindering integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00438-x
Suastra, I. W., & Ristiati, N. P. (2021). Transformasi model pembelajaran berbasis proyek kolaboratif untuk meningkatkan keterampilan abad 21 siswa. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40(1), 143-156. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i1.35036
Subekti, H., Taufiq, M., & Erman, E. (2021). Mengembangkan Kompetensi Pedagogis STEM Guru Melalui Pelatihan dan Pendampingan Pembelajaran Active Learning. Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, 7 (1), 34–42.
Suwarma, I. R., Astuti, P., & Hermita, N. (2021). Professional Development Program for Science Teachers: Reconstructing PCK through STEM-Based Experiential Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806 (1), 012045.
Suyanto, dkk. (2025). Naskah Akademik Pembelajaran Mendalam. Pusat Kurikulum, Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
Thibaut, L., De Meester, J., Struyf, A., Depaepe, F., & Goovaerts, L. (2022). Integrated STEM education: A longitudinal study in lower secondary education. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00338-x
Tsiotakis, P., & Jimoyiannis, A. (2021). Peer learning in online teacher professional development: Examining active engagement and perspective exchange in collaborative environments. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 3125–3148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10400-0


Van Leeuwen, A., Hornstra, L., & Flunger, B. (2023). Teacher interventions during collaborative learning: How do they relate to students’ collective efficacy, cognitive engagement, and knowledge construction?. Instructional Science, 51(3), 441-470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-023-09618-5
Wahono, B., & Chang, C. Y. (2020). Assessing Teacher's STEM Pedagogical Content Knowledge (STEM-PCK) in STEM Education Implementation. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29 (4), 355–366.
Wibowo, A., & Handayani, T. (2021). Analisis Dimensi Behavioral, Emotional, dan Cognitive Engagement Guru Pada Program Pelatihan Berbasis Pengalaman. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 7 (1), 89–98.
Widodo, A. (2021). Pengembangan Profesionalisme Guru IPA Melalui Refleksi dan Rekonstruksi Pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 9 (2), 112–125.
World Economic Forum. (2023). The Future of Jobs Report 2023. World Economic Forum.
Yan, Z., & Pastore, S. (2022). Teacher assessment literacy for learning: A systematic review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 29(4), 421–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2022.2120328
Yildirim, B. (2022). The impact of an experiential STEM education program on science, technology, engineering, and mathematics teachers’ self-efficacy and STEM pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of STEM Teacher Education, 57(1), 60–84. https://doi.org/10.30707/JSTE57.1.1664983050.217332
Yoon, S. A., Anderson, E., Klopfer, E., Wang, J., Sheldon, J., & Wendel, D. (2021). Designing Professional Development for Cognitive and Affective Support in Teaching for Socio-scientific Issues. Research in Science Education, 51(4), 1081–1100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-09997-w